NAFTA: Good, Bad or Spongy-Poo
I read an article on NAFTA this morning and just had to e-mail the author. The article and my response are below. I'll post any reply I receive.
Re: http://www.ttgconsultants.com/articles/freetrade.html
----------------------------------------------
Okay, that's the end of my comments to the author. I might also have wanted to point out that if NAFTA has truly done so much for the Mexican economy, then the illegal aliens currently residing in this country should be anxious to return. I wonder why they are not and why so many Mexican continue to come across our border illegally?
Another thing that occurs to me is that since companies are moving their jobs out of this country and not supporting this economy, perhaps they should not be able to sell their products here. After all, a good economy is produced by money moving around, not just being sucked up by the wealthy who produce for pennies and collect dollars. If they want to depress wages, maybe they should be forced to depress prices, too.
Finally, in response to the idea that NAFTA has lowered unemployment, one may want to consider that flipping burgers is now considered a manufacturing job. This "job" pays little more than minimum wage and has little or no real benefits. Yeah, NAFTA has lowered unemployment, after employment was re-defined. It works kind of like the standard line on inflation that our government now use: "Not counting fuel costs, there was no inflation last quarter." I wonder if that works in other situations? "Your Honor, not counting the bank robbery, I committed no crime." Honey, not counting my secretary, I didn't cheat on you."

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home